Thursday, November 11, 2004
But Google guy also has a good sense of humour, He sometimes try to divert people from manipulating their search engine, This particular post looks like that,
As far as I can tell, the launch today is moving their newest technology from techpreview.search.msn.com to beta.search.msn.com. According to Walt Mossberg at the Wall Street Journal, MSN has promised to move their new technology over to the main search box by the end of January. That's less than 2.5 months, so I recommend that everyone spend their full attention coming up to speed on beta.search.msn.com.
It's very rare to get to see a search engine in transition, because that's the best time to see what the different criteria are for ranking.
Do you see their three sliders? They are for "Very popular vs. less popular", "Exact match vs. approximate match", and "static vs. updated recently." It's really cool to play with these sliders. I'm sure that a lot of WebmasterWorld moderators are off tweaking values to get an idea of how things are computed, and what the relative weight are. For example, if you move the slider all the way to very popular and click search again--viagra.com disappears from the first page! That's a little counterintuitive to me, and it makes for some really interesting speculation about what Microsoft means by popular.
Most search engine optimizers will be fascinated by the ability to play with sliders and try to reverse-engineer how Microsoft is ranking. Not since Nutch have people gotten such a good view at the different components in ranking for a major search engine. Because of that and the fact the MSN has promised their new search will go live by January, I'd get busy playing. :)
Here's one other tidbit I came across while reading this morning. Following on Google and Yahoo's launch of blogs, MSN has launched a blog for its search engine as well: blogs.msdn.com/msnsearch Highly recommended reading--they've got comments enabled, too. I've really enjoyed playing with the new search, and I'd recommend that everyone spend 2-3 days getting familiar with how MSN is ranking pages--I think the effort will pay off.
Everyone who is aware of google guy will definetely understand googleguy is upto something in this post, From what I can see he wants to decieve some dumb SEOs, Definetely he cannot play with the smart ones,
The slider feature is an excellent feature from MSN search engine, Google guy should be really afraid that they dont have that feature, He comments on the viagra authority site not ranking with the slider is increased to most popular, From my Opinion the obvious weight search engines have on backlink anchor text is same with MSN, Googleguy knows it that is what he is trying to say from his post,
Now that the MSN search is out we should see some shifts, We just have to wait, MSN has invested heavily on their new search engine which will have direct impact on the quality of their search results,
The beta version of the search is here:
http://beta.search.msn.com
As soon as the initial launch the beta version had some technical difficulties, Some of us were unable to reach the beta search the following command was seen on the search page,
"The site is unavailable, Please check back soon"
Screenshot:
It was a bit weird since this was their launch date of the beta version, Then i came across a posting where it mentioned MSN has launched their own blog,
In the MSN search blog/weblog I found the following information posted,
"In the process of making our new MSN Search beta broadly available we
experienced some technical difficulties that caused the beta service to function
improperly or be unavailable for some users for periods of time. We're working
through these issues one by one and you should see service availability and
quality improve soon if not already. We apologize for any
inconvenience.
We expected to find some problems in the beta, and we
expect there will also be times when we limit service availability for
maintenance purposes. We want to find those problems in order to help us
build a higher quality product, and we appreciate your help in doing this.
A
few other notes:
1) Several people have reported problems with the search
service and with this blog that appear to be browser compatibility issues with
FireFox. We're working on broad browser support and have done some
specific testing in this area, but it's clear more is needed. Thank you
for the reports.
2) When reporting issues, please include
as much detailed information as you can in your report so that we can reproduce
and fix the bug. E.g. for browser errors, tell us which type of browser,
the version number, and information on any proxy you're using. For
relevance problems, tell us the exact query you entered, any other special
settings you're using, e.g. via search builder, and the resulting URL you
expected to see.
3) The "Help us Improve" link at the bottom of the results
page is an easy way to give us feedback.
"
But later i was able to perform searches for some of the sites we monitor, It was good, Most of the results are similiar to google which is very good, From my understanding google uses the best IR algorithm out there, Now MSN search engine seem to be the direct contender to Google,
Google with their link lag algorithm is not too impressive these days, Hope google finds MSN search a real competition and do some update to their algo,